Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Interesting email from COMPASS



Richmond By-election

Dear Iain, 

A progressive alliance isn’t something we build for the future, but something we can create right now. Zac Goldsmith has given us a chance in Richmond Park – we must take it. Today Compass is issuing the following statement calling on Labour and the Greens to give the Liberal Democrats a clear run in the by-election:

The Richmond Park by-election is a huge progressive opportunity. Zac Goldsmith ran a racially divisive campaign for the London mayoralty, and was staunchly in favour of the Leave side in this year’s referendum. Now, his decision to trigger this latest contest – in which he is the de facto Tory candidate - offers a chance to reject the politics of division, reduce the Tories’ already slender majority, oppose “hard” Brexit in a seat that was overwhelming remain - and show what can happen when progressive parties work together, not against each other.
This is why we are calling on the progressive parties to get round the table and agree which has the maximum chance of defeating the Tories. The Lib Dems held the seat until 2005, and in 2010 won 43% of the vote – and the result of the Witney by-election suggests they could win in Richmond Park, if other progressive parties agree not to run competing candidates that simply wastes votes and let the Tories in.
We call on the Liberal Democrats to select an anti-third runway candidate and reflect the pro-European views of the 70% in the seat who voted for remain. There now needs to be active negotiations between the Lib Dems, Labour and the Greens that includes a reciprocal alliance when the next appropriate local or national election occurs. This is the best way to ensure competing candidates do not run and let the Tories in.

We know this is tough on local parties that want to use by-elections to become more visible. The need to act this way is entirely the product of our toxic electoral system that ensures the majority of voters are now simply ignored. There are some occasions when bigger issues are at stake.

There is a precedent. Such an alliance worked in Tatton in 1997 when the progressive parties put the national interest before party interest and stood down to defeat the Tories. It is such a moment once more.
This is a huge political moment and we urge you to get the message out – please Tweet and get on Facebook - the Tories can and must be defeated In Richmond Park.
If you live in Richmond and are interested in helping Compass organise a local meeting ahead of the by-election, please get in touch. And if you can, please donate to support us in building a progressive alliance. 
Very best,

The Compass Management Committee

If you no longer wish to receive email updates from Compassunsubscribe here

Thursday, 6 October 2016

Birkdale Liberal Club remembered on the anniversary of Baron de Forest's death

This morning the Liberal History Group tweeted: ON THIS DAY 6th October 1968:

The Baron fought one of the 1910 elections in Southport where his Jewish antecedence played a large part in the Tory campaign Their candidate was a Col White, so you cannimagine the use that was made of his name in contrast to the foreign sounding Maurice de Forest.  

The postcard picture of the club was found in the Grosvenor Road garage  of a  Mr Williamson some years ago. I think his father was on the committee of the Birkdale Liberal Club. (The garage also had a copy of Lloyd Georges 1929 Manifesto We Can Conquer Unemployment which has featured on the blog before) The Coulton’s bread shop will be familiar to  people in Birkdale . A delivery boy  with a large basket used to deliver a loaf to local residents each week. The children in the area used to run after him shouting” Coulton’s Bread is as hard as lead people who eat it drop down dead “ I think the bakery was in Upper Aughton Road.
Birkdale Liberal Club 1910 General Election
The reference to CB on one of the posters  is Charles Brumm who was a leading Birkdale Liberal whose German ancestry caused him to resign the Presidency of the party in  September1914.

The Birkdale Liberal Club did not sell intoxicants but I think there was an arrangement whereby those wanted to could bring in alcohol.

The Birkdale Nightingale, National Poetry Day

The Birkdale Nightingale

On Spring nights you can hear them
two miles away, calling their mates
to the breeding place, a wet slack in the dunes.
Lovers hiding nearby are surprised
by desperate music. One man searched all night
for a crashed spaceship.

For amphibians, they are terrible swimmers:
where it's tricky to get ashore, they drown.
By day they sleep in crevices under the boardwalk,
run like lizards from cover to cover
without the sense to leap when a gull snaps.
Yes, he can make himself fearsome,
inflating his lungs to double his size.
But cars on the coast road are not deterred.

She will lay a necklace of pearls in the reeds.
Next morning, a dog will run into the water and scatter them.
Or she'll spawn in a footprint filled with salt rain
that will dry to a crust in two days.

Still, when he calls her and climbs her
they are well designed. The nuptial pads on his thighs
velcro him to her back. She steadies beneath him.

The puddle brims with moonlight.
Everything leads to this.

Crosby U3A visit to Bootle Town Hall

 Crosby U3A (University of the third age) visited Bootle Town Hall recently. These tours of the Mayoral corridor and the Council Chamber are very popular with local history groups. Bootle Town Hall has a lot history recorded in the gifts that the Council has received over the years. My experience is that  the U3A bring a extra local knowledge with them that adds to our understanding of history of the building and the borough. This visit was no exception as among those attending was the redoubtable Brenda Murray whose long life has been spent studying the history our area.

I met Brenda again later in the week when we both attended A Night at the Opera hosted by Sacred Heart Catholic College and performed by Una Voce. Brenda proudly told me she was the college's oldest old girl having left in 1942.

Wednesday, 5 October 2016

Suspended Southport Tory Councillor disowned by former colleagues after Police deny bizarre claim

Claims made by Councillor David Barton at (21st September) Southport Area Committee that an unnamed officer from Merseyside Police sanctioned his plans for a ‘private army’ to patrol the streets of Southport has prompted a senior Lib Dem councillor to call for an inquiry.

Birkdale Councillor Simon Shaw is Vice-Chair of the Merseyside Police Panel which oversees the work of the Police Commissioner.  He was written to the Commissioner, Jane Kennedy, asking her to ensure that “Merseyside Police investigate to establish who is telling the truth here.”

Last week suspended Conservative councillor David Barton announced his controversial plan for a ‘private army’ to patrol Southport’s streets and this provoked much discussion at the Area Committee meeting.

Local police inspectors attending the meeting expressed their concerns about the proposal and said that they had not been consulted.  However Cllr Barton then proceeded to read out a prepared statement in which he claimed that Merseyside Police had “sent out a detective from head office” who allegedly told him that “there is no issue with adopting this approach.”

However suspicions were raised when Cllr David Barton refused to give the name of the officer who he claimed had sanctioned the move, saying “it would be inappropriate at this time to disclose that officer's name”, despite Cllr Shaw asking him twice.

Cllr Shaw condemned the secrecy, saying: “Cllr Barton’s claims about what this ‘secret policeman’ said are highly dubious.  As he is implying that someone in the police is not telling the truth, I think it is essential that his claims are fully investigated.”

“In particular I am concerned about his bizarre jibe addressed to the local police inspectors who attended the Area Committee when he said ‘if you don't know about it, maybe there's a reason why not’.  It’s all very suspect.”

“That’s why I have written to Police Commissioner Jane Kennedy, advising her of the facts and asking her to ensure that Merseyside Police investigate who, exactly, is telling the truth here.”

The following is a transcript of Cllr David Barton’s prepared statement:

“I have read Merseyside Police's and Southport BID's comments where it is claimed that they knew nothing about security patrols.  I can inform you however that the Force did send out a detective from head office - if you don't know about it, maybe there's a reason why not - I can however assure you that discussion was had on this very matter.  The reply I received was that there is no issue with adopting this approach to tackling anti-social behaviour and that anyone can have a security firm on the proviso that they are fully vetted and licensed.  It would be inappropriate at this time to disclose that officer's name; it is not the time to discuss a private conversation of an operational nature.  It is strictly speaking a contract between local businesses and the security firm.  And the response to Southport BID: with all due respect, sir, you have had over 18 months to deal with this issue of anti-social behaviour.”

David Barton
 Conservative Councillors, Terry Jones, Pat Ball and Harry Bliss, have recently discussed the issues regarding a private security firm being recruited to patrol Southport. This has raised some key concerns.

Cllr Harry Bliss, also Chairman of Southport Conservatives, says ”Cllr Jones, Ball and myself and the Southport Conservative Association are disappointed with the recent actions of Independent Councillor, David Barton and his unwillingness to take expert advice.

We are disappointed that Cllr Barton decided not to enter into any sort of consultation with those responsible for securing the safety of our town. We did not have any prior knowledge either”.

He continued “Rather than just launch this ‘private’ initiative, we believe a consultation should have taken place to identify any specific problems and then agree the best way to tackle them”.

Cllr Jones added “We wish to make it very clear that we do not support or approve of the actions taken by Cllr Barton. We believe the safety of residents, visitors and businesses is a priority. We will do our utmost to gain the correct support that is needed to make this happen. We are meeting with the necessary organisations to ensure everyone is safe within Southport”.

The Liberal Tune Book 1910

The Liberator Song Book brought out a new edition (again) this year. There are some new songs and one or two from the back catalogue of the 1960's and 70's. One such 'For all the Trots' -a song which one can't but help feel has some contemporary relevance-was included despite the editors failure to track down the tune. I was able to help out, it was set to the tune written by Ralph Vaughan Williams in 1906 for the hymn 'For All the Saints'  which he called Sine Nomine (literally, "without name") in reference to its use on the Feast of All Saints,. In common with all their songbooks the Liberator editors had unearthed some songs from a hundred years or more ago.

This brought to mind that my old colleague Bill Leathwood who had given me a copy of a Liberal Song Sheet from 1910 that had been his father's. You can read about Bill in a posting that I wrote when he died aged 92 in 2011. He had been our Chief Whip when I was on Cheshire County Council

Friday, 23 September 2016

Realighnment of the Left

Realignment of the Left is back on the agenda. It is not hard to understand why. Already the idea has spawned books, public meeting and a lot of debate. This was the great project of Jo Grimond's leadership of the Liberal Party. Today with a Corbyn led Labour Party few people can see that party winning seats from the Tories at the next elections. They may well pile up bigger majorities in some of their existing seats but it is hard to see where they can win seats especially after the boundary review. Our first past the post electoral system doesn't help. It does look as if we are in for a period of uninterrupted Tory rule, even  people like Neil Kinnock doesn't expect to see another Labour government in his lifetime.  Left wing former Labour Minister Chris Mullin has come out in favour of a pact explaining that for the Tories to be defeated it requires Lib Dems to win seats Labour have no chance in. So the question is : can a progressive programme be agreed between the competing parties compelling enough to make some electoral arrangement acceptable.

One initiative that has been launched is the publication of a book The Alternative edited by Lisa Nandy, Caroline Lucas and Chris Bowers. It is significant because it does not spend all its pages discussing how and electoral arrangement could be achieved, rather it begins with ideas around which common agreement can be reached.

The Social Liberal Forum (SLF) sponsored a meeting at the Lib Dem Conference this year and put together the three editors of the book along with David Howarth a former Lib Dem MP for Cambridge. (David stood down without being defeated) The SLF has heard from Ms Lucas before alongside Neil Lawson from COMPASS and few doubt that with goodwill and common-sense a deal could be done with the Greens-despite some of their obvious difficulties. Labour is a harder issue. The electoral reality is dawning on some folk in Labour. The fear of grammar schools, welfare cuts, the NHS, a hard Britex  are combining to focus minds. Nevertheless too many Labour activists think pluralism and compromise are dirty words. Their monopolistic view of power and their right to exercise it makes it hard to see where agreement may come-or maybe I'm just scarred by having spent most of political life in the NW. And therefore the meeting was genuinely interested to hear Lisa Nandy's pitch.

Now, without dwelling too long on the point, it should be said that Ms Nandy has some Liberal antecedence in so much as her Grandfather was a Liberal MP and Leader of the Liberal Party in the Lords for 17 years. There was much agitation in radical ranks about his relationship with Rio Tinto Zinc, the mining company, and its activities in Africa . None of that is Ms Nandy's responsibility .

I thought she was convincing and indeed impressive. She is clearly of the left, which was a relief, too often we see Labour MP's at odds with their party who are by inclination reactionary and authoritarian-John Reid, Jack Straw et al- ( and some of the people who fancy themselves to be on the left John Mann or Dennis Skinner are the personification of tribalism)  She acknowledged the stand we took on civil rights and accepted Labour's failure in that area and pointed out Labours challenge to the coalition over welfare (at which point she had a more sympathetic audience than she might have imagined-as the following days votes on welfare confirmed).

In so much as she used her family connection she did so to in relation to Frank Byers Liberal politics having been fashioned by his opposition to fascism . I am always impressed by the record of those Liberals who came back from the war determined to build a new international order. Lord Rea who led the Liberal Peers till Byers took over was one such case  David Dutton writing in the Journal of Liberal History recordsAs Liberal leader in the Lords Rea found himself obliged to speak on a wide range of issues. But, with the Cold War at its height, he was especially concerned with reducing the risk of nuclear war and for Britain to abandon her pretensions to great power status. The country ‘seemed to find it difficult to realise that her nineteenth-century position in the world was not in abeyance but actually gone. Britain must adapt her ideas to the modern world.’ Such thinking made him particularly contemptuous of the notion that Britain remained an independent nuclear power. ‘Why should we attract an onslaught on this undefended island by the provocative possession of a virtually useless contribution to American nuclear arms? That would be the very reverse of a deterrent. ’ It was that approach which led Liberals to embrace federalism and the European project.

Lisa Nandy's proposition was that the prospect of long term Tory rule requires us all to think again and explore thoroughly the alternatives.

The video clip at the top of this post shows a little of David Howarth's contribution. I think it is important to assert that any agreement must be based ideas and values. I have felt for some time that the divorce between values and class loyalty is overdue. David make the case better that I can.

There are those who dislike the term Left. I am not one. It is a short hand for those dissatisfied with the status quo. For a season it came, somewhat perversely, to mean political ideas that championed state ownership and regulation. Hence tyrannical Communist states were seen as Left. The coming down of the Berlin war changed that although the statist Left still clings to loyally to some models. Eliot Dodds, who would have been well known to Ms Nandi's grandfather, robustly defends the Liberal position as on the  Left in his chapter in The Unservile State (1957)  when he wrote: by any strict use of language Liberals are the true Left, the real progressives'. He wanted men and women to be in charge of their own destinies with the aim of 'giving more abundant life, to the individual person. So those of us that are angry about the mal-distribution of power and wealth in today's economies should at least try to work together.

Let me leave you with a bit Grimond-who after all can be claimed as the Granddaddy of the idea:

In an interview in the Observer immediately after the 1959 election, Jo Grimond, the Liberal leader, called for radicals in the Liberal and Labour Parties to make a new appeal to ordinary people to take an active part in political life. Asked how a Socialist party could cooperate with a non-Socialist one, he replied that ‘there might be a bridge between Socialism and the Liberal policy of co-ownership in industry through a type of syndicalism coupled with a nonconformist outlook such as was propounded on many issues by George Orwell’.1 Industrial democracy and a tolerance of dissent, which were also distinctive marks of the New Left, were symptoms of a change in ideological thinking in Britain which was not confined to the socialist movement

Monday, 12 September 2016

Trevor Jones, Sutton and Cheam by election and being fed at the NLC

Back in 1972 I was an undergraduate in London. I was active in the YL's and was one of the small group who started going to Sutton and Cheam to help deliver the first Focus leaflet soon after it was announced the Tory MP Sir Richard Sharples was to be Governor of Bermuda.  On more than one occasion Trevor arranged to drive me back in to central London and fed me at the NLC. I learned a great deal from those meal time conversations.

I have never lived in Liverpool or been involved in the day to day politics of the city but , like many of my generation, took a keen interest in in what was going on there. Unlike some folk who copy some of their practices Trevor and his team drew on the radical tradition in the party and as such was a natural ally for YL's battling against some of the less progressive forces around in the party. Trevor may well be remembered for his electioneering but I recall that he was a man of political ideas as well.I found he was someone you could always just ring up for advice

I recall travelling in the back of his Triumph Stag (?)  from Liverpool to a Party Council in Cardiff when there was some business that we were keen to oppose.

In his role as Party President he did shake up the party and transform it into an operation that believed it could win elections.

Wednesday, 31 August 2016

Dan Dare and the Mekon return to Southport

As readers of the Mayoral blog will know I have been spending some time at The Atkinson recently. On my way out this afternoon I passed through an exhibition I had not noticed before and part of it featured the adventures of Dan Dare. As readers of a certain vintage will know the Eagle comic was a remarkably successful publication. The stories , in the main, were written by a Birkdale Clergy man the Vicar of St James's Marcus Morris and the artwork was produced by a lecturer at the Southport Art College Frank Hampson.

They have some excellent exhibits including some of the original artwork. If you are an Eagel fan it is well work a visit.

Thursday, 14 July 2016

'Northern Powerhouse’ progress: Slower than the Southport to Manchester train?

A guest post from Lauren Keith on the so called Northern Power House

The Northern Powerhouse is fast becoming a political cliché. The 8 Lib Dem MP’s (led by Southport’s own MP John Pugh) have recently published a report claiming that the initiative is in danger of becoming little more than smoke and mirrors.

It’s about time that there was a thorough analysis of what the Northern Powerhouse actually means and what it has really achieved.

The report argues that rather than being a comprehensive and new plan bringing additional funding to the North it is in fact just semantics. The authors reflect that while the city devolution deals may seem like large sums of money, when central government cuts are taken into account Northern cities were actually still left at a loss.  In Liverpool the figure of £30 million a year is totally negated when the 43% cut in local authority budgets is taken into account. They are also sceptical about the power that the newly created city regions actually have, arguing that working with UKTI to boost trade and powers for new skills provisions are merely programmes rather than substantive power. 
The other powerful point made is that the transport programmes that have been implemented or are in planning so far, tend to focus on the connections between the North and London. This ignores the connections between Northern cities and crucially between Northern cities and the wider region.
It’s pretty apparent that the Northern Powerhouse idea is very much focused around the cities of Manchester, Liverpool and Sheffield rather than the wider region. A recent report by think tank IPPR North looked at the status of small and medium sized towns and cities in the Northern Powerhouse framework. Crucially, their research found that connectivity is more important than size or concentration when it comes to unlocking economic success and productivity. One of the paper’s policy recommendations is for Transport for the North to ensure that its future strategy development takes account of the ‘complexity of the North’s urban ecosystem.’  In other words, recognising that the North isn’t just two cities but a web of smaller towns and cities!

The Northern Powerhouse concept is symptomatic of the general approach by Government in response to a ‘problem’. Thinking up a new strategy, appointing taskforces or ‘Tsars’ and creating ‘zones’ seems to be currently in vogue.  The danger of this is paralysis through over analysis and a failure sometimes to see the glaringly obvious.

Investing in critical infrastructure, improving broadband and rail and road connections and increasing education and training provision and opportunities are surely the key basics for economic success.
The first direct air link to China has just been launched from Manchester yet at the same time that the Manchester Airport service from Southport is apparently being reviewed. Surely the equation for the social and economic success of a town or city is diversity of population and connections to other cities and hubs. There is the tangible ease of access to other regional businesses that this connectivity brings, but there is also the vibrancy that comes with this. Better transport links means that people can more easily commute to work and will be more likely to live in smaller towns like Southport. In Southport’s case, this would inevitably mean that retail, leisure and other offerings will grow to cater for a more mixed population as the young professional demographic increases.

There is no one size fits all policy to unlocking prosperity. Southport, for example, is an excellent place for running with several parks and a beautiful sea-front. The annual half-marathon is a great initiative that will attract visitors to the area. Similarly, the town is also synonymous with golf as a result of the Open at Birkdale. Lord Street, the apparent inspiration for the Parisian boulevards, is the perfect setting for a strong retail and leisure offering.  Each town and city has its own strengths and weaknesses and it is up to local leaders to capitalise on these and be allowed the freedom and voice to do so.

Only when towns like Southport are able to shape their own destiny rather than being seen as under the umbrella of a larger city will the ‘Northern Powerhouse’ really be harnessed. 

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

The Freedome of England by God’ Blessing Restored

On the Mayoral Blog I has writing about the visit of Formby U3A to Bootle Town Hall. Among the items of interest were the maces and admiralty oar that are carried in front of the Mayor at Council meeting and on other civic occasions

The maces we were looking at were from the former Bootle Council and Crosby and Waterloo Council. They were heavily decorated with royal emblems. My mind went back to an occasion a couple of decades ago when I was a member of Congleton Borough Council and I was being shown the town's treasurers by a local historian. The prize possession was a mace, but this one started life as a republican mace and was, allegedly, the model for the one made for the House of Commons. You will recall that Charles1 lost his head in 1649 and The Commonwealth was declared. The Congleton mace dates from that time.
As the Town Council website explains:

Town Mace
Silver gilt, made in 1651, the mace has an intriguing historical connection with the execution of King Charles 1. It is reputed to have been used as a model for the House of Commons mace and is still carried in front of the Mayor on ceremonial occasions by the Mace Bearer. An inscription around the head of the mace, originally said: “The Freedome of England by God’ Blessing Restored.” But, in 1660 King Charles II regained the throne and the inscription was considered subversive. The town accounts of 1661 refer to a sum of £3 being “payd to ye goldsmyth for altering ye Mace.” The date was changed, somewhat clumsily, from 1651 to 1661 and the phrase “to C.R” (Charles Rex) added to the inscription. These alterations can be clearly seen today.

Monday, 13 June 2016

Good politics like good religion should seek to break down barriers not build new ones and encourage us to do more than focus on purely national interests.

My Chaplain during my year as Mayor is Canon Dr, Rod Garner . His most recent column in the Southport Visiter explains why he will being voting to remain in the European Union. It reminds me of something Russell Johnson might have said...


It’s 25 years since Dr. Helen Sharman became the first British female astronaut to go into space. In a recent radio interview she was asked if the original journey felt a long time ago. Without hesitation she replied that it was all still wonderfully fresh and real. The enthusiasm in her voice left me in doubt that this was so. In particular she recalled how from space, geographical boundaries quickly melt away. As she gazed upon our blue and fragile planet, her attention was initially and quite understandably directed to our own country. Fairly quickly however, she became absorbed by the continents and then to the Earth itself, bounded only by unending darkness. Countries and states, walls and boundaries, historical separations caused by wars or geological shifts over aeons of time, seemed to dissolve before her eyes. Now there was just the Earth in its splendour and teeming life in all its forms.
I’ve been thinking about the interview and how it has some bearing on how I will vote on Thursday 23 rd June. That’s the day of course when the UK decides if it will remain in leave the European Union (EU). By then we can expect more contradictory facts, opinions and arguments ranging from the plausible to the ludicrous or even offensive. I’m still listening to most of them and it’s not easy separating truth from fiction. My mind is made up however. For me, this important decision does not rest solely on the key economic and political issues that are shaping the current debate. I do want the best outcomes for Britain’s future in terms of jobs, travel, national security and manageable control of our borders but there is something else that compels me. It has do with my sense of European history and the way our shared cultural values have been shaped so profoundly by Greek philosophy, Roman law and the religious traditions of Judaism and Christianity. Put simply, who I am, where I belong, the people and places, values and ideas that have influenced me, extend far beyond these shores. I am proud to be British and can sing ‘Jerusalem’ with a voice worthy of the Last Night of the Proms. I think our inherited values are worth defending and only wish they were more evident in blighted parts of our world. We also invented football and produced George Best. Those last two facts alone should give us pride of place at any international table!
With all this acknowledged however, I still feel a citizen of a larger European world separated only by a meagre strip of the English Channel. We are an island race with our own proud traditions but we are also indebted to wider and no less gracious influences beyond the UK. Difference is life-enhancing and enables us to grow and learn. Good politics like good religion should seek to break down barriers not build new ones and encourage us to do more than focus on purely national interests. Viewed from space, which is another way of looking at the world with the mind of the Creator, we all appear the same with the creative gifts and shared humanity that can enrich our common life in an increasingly precarious world. When the big day comes on 23rd June I’m voting ‘in’ partly because of the question of who I think I am and, furthermore, where we fit as a nation in the bigger scheme of things. It’s a matter of personal and shared identity as well as beneficial trading arrangements and secure borders. You might want to ask yourself the same question if you are still undecided.
Canon Dr, Rod Garner

Saturday, 4 June 2016

At last a Labour person finally making a progressive case for Europe, what took so long?

Watch this excellent video by Gordon Brown. At last someone, other than Tim, making the internationalist case for Europe. At last someone else talking about peace and human writes and not obsessing about a Tory leadership challenge.